ISSN 1309-1581
TR EN
2025 Fall/Güz | Cilt 16, Sayı 4

Çevik Dijital Dönüşümün Kilit Başarı Faktörleri: Çevik Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamalarının Normalleştirilmesi

Key Success Factors of Agile Digital Transformation: Normalizing Agile Information Technology and Human Resources Practices
Fatma Zehra Köker
DOI: 10.5824/ajite.2025.04.007.x
Sayfa: 450-497
PDF İndir
DergiPark'ta Görüntüle
Crossmark Yayın kaydını kontrol et
5 görüntülenme
3 indirme
Türkçe
TR Öz

Çevik Dijital Dönüşümün Kilit Başarı Faktörleri: Çevik Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamalarının Normalleştirilmesi

Değişimi rekabet avantajına çevirmeye odaklanan örgüte özgü çevik uygulamalarda yalından yararlanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma, çevik dijital dönüşüm başarısının temelinde olan çevik bilgi teknolojileri (BT) ve insan kaynakları (İK) uygulanmalarına yönelik teorik ve pratik katkılar sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, büyük ölçekli üretim örgütlerindeki çevik dijital dönüşümü gerçekleştiren çevik BT ve İK uygulamalarının normalleştirilmesini zorlaştıran/kolaylaştıran faktörleri tespit eden bir doktora çalışmasının ampirik bulguları aydınlatılmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı çevik BT ve İK uygulamalarında karşılaşılan bağlamsal zorlukları Normalleşme Süreci Kuramı (NSK) ile tespit etmek ve gidermektir. NSK uygulamasıyla; örgüte özgü çevik BT/İK pratikleri normalleştirilmekte (uygulama ve benimseme gerçekleştirilmekte) ve çevikleşmenin sıkıntısız olarak sürdürülmesi sağlanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, çevik dijital dönüşüme gitmiş olan örgütlerde, pilot çalışma dahil on bir BT/İK uzmanıyla/yöneticisiyle derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formuyla toplanan verilere tematik içerik analizi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular literatür bulgularıyla karşılaştırılmıştır. Çevik BT/İK pratiklerinin uygulanmasını kolaylaştıran başlıca yedi kilit faktör şunlardır (NSK merceğinden): Örgütün problem çözme yeteneğini artıran çevik BT ve İK pratiklerini örgütsel gereksinimlere uygun olarak tasarlamak. Tasarlanan çevik BT/İK pratiklerinin gerekçesini ve amacını başta kilit çalışanlarla ilişkilendirerek açık ve net bir şekilde ortaya koymak. Tasarlanan çevik BT/İK pratiklerinin, (hedeflenen iş değerine ulaşma) başarısını pilot projelerle kanıtlamak ve tüm paydaşları bilgilendirmek. Kısa ve yinelemeli çevik eğitimlerin ekip, proje ve departman performansı üzerindeki etkisini ölçmek. Çapraz fonksiyonlu BT/İK ekiplerinin yakın iş birliği ve iletişim içerisinde çalışmaya devam etmeleri için yeterli motivasyona, becerilere ve ekip içi uyuma sahip olduklarından emin olmak. Ekiplerin zaman içinde değişen gereksinimlere göre çevik BT/İK pratiklerini ayarlama ve değiştirme sorumluluğunu almalarını sağlamak. Çapraz fonksiyonlu BT/İK ekipleri tarafından uygulanan çevik pratiklerin, üst yönetim tarafından yeterince desteklendiğinden emin olmak. Diğer yandan, çevik BT/İK pratiklerinin uygulanmasını zorlaştıran başlıca iki kilit faktör şunlardır (NSK merceğinden): Çevik BT ve İK pratiklerinin faydalı olduğundan şüphelenen çalışanların ve yöneticilerin şüphelerini yönetememek. Çevik pratikleri uygulayan otonom ve çapraz fonksiyonlu ekiplerle müzakere yapmaya yeterince zaman ayırmamak.
Anahtar Kelimeler
yalınçevikdijital dönüşümnormalleşme süreci kuramıçoklu vaka çalışması
EN Abstract

Key Success Factors of Agile Digital Transformation: Normalizing Agile Information Technology and Human Resources Practices

Lean is utilized in organization-specific agile practices focused on transforming change into competitive advantage. This study offers theoretical and practical contributions to agile information technology (IT) and human resources (HR) practices, which are fundamental to the success of agile digital transformation. This study illuminates the empirical findings of a doctoral study that identifies factors that facilitate/challenge the normalization of agile IT and HR practices that facilitate agile digital transformation in large-scale manufacturing organizations. The study aims to identify and address contextual challenges encountered in agile IT and HR practices using Normalization Process Theory (NPT). With the NPT application, organization-specific agile IT/HR practices are normalized (implemented and adopted), ensuring the smooth implementation of agile transformation. To this end, in-depth interviews were conducted with eleven IT/HR experts/managers, including a pilot study, in organizations that have undergone agile digital transformation. Thematic content analysis was applied to the data collected using a semi-structured interview form. The findings were compared with literature findings. The seven key factors that facilitate the implementation of agile IT/HR practices are as follows (through NPT lens): Designing agile IT and HR practices that enhance the organization's problem-solving capabilities in line with organizational requirements. Clearly and explicitly communicating the rationale and purpose of the designed agile IT/HR practices with key employees, starting with the initial engagement. Proving the success of the designed agile IT/HR practices (achieving the targeted business value) through pilot projects and informing all stakeholders. Measuring the impact of short, iterative agile training sessions on team, project, and department performance. Ensuring that cross-functional IT/HR teams have sufficient motivation, skills, and cohesion to continue working in close collaboration and communication. Ensuring that teams take responsibility for adjusting and modifying agile IT/HR practices according to changing needs over time. Ensuring that the agile practices implemented by cross-functional IT/HR teams are adequately supported by senior management. On the other hand, the two key factors that hinder the implementation of agile IT/HR practices are as follows (through NPT lens): Failure to manage the skepticism of employees and managers who are skeptical of the effectiveness of agile IT and HR practices. Not spending enough time negotiating with autonomous, cross-functional teams implementing agile practices.
Keywords
leanagiledigital transformationnormalisation process theorymultiple case study
Kaynakça 77
  1. Agile Manifesto Organization (2025, January 9). Principles behind the agile manifesto, Agile
  2. Albers, A., Heimicke, J., & Trost, S. (2020a, August). Effects and interactions of agile principles in
  3. Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Trost, S., & Spadinger, M. (2020b). Alignment of the change to agile through
  4. Alqudah, M., & Razali, R. (2017). Key factors for selecting an agile method: a systematic. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology, 7(2), 526-537. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.2.1830
  5. Altuwaijri, F. S., & Ferrario, M. A. (2022). Factors affecting agile adoption: an industry research study of the mobile app sector in saudi arabia. Journal of Systems and Software, 190, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111347
  6. Armour, F. (2001). Enterprise architecture: Agile transition and implementation. IT Professional, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1109/6294.977769
  7. Arulsamy, A. S., Singh, I., Kumar, M. S., Panchal, J. J., & Bajaj, K. K. (2023). Employee training and development enhancing employee performance-A study. Samdarshi, 16(3), 1-11.
  8. Balasubramaniam, V. S., Vijayabaskar, S., Voola, P. K., Agarwal, R., & Goel, O. (2022). Improving digital transformation in enterprises through agile methodologies. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 13(5), 507-537.
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Psikolojide tematik analizin kullanımı. S. N. Şad, N. Özer ve A. Atli (Çevirenler). Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(2), 873-898. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c.2s.17m
  10. Brown, A. W. (2011). A Case study in agile-at-scale delivery. In A. Sillitti, A., Hazzan, O., Bache, E., Albaladejo, X. (Eds.), XP (pp. 266-281). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20677-1_19
  11. Carroll, N., & Conboy, K. (2020). Normalising the "new normal": Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure. International journal of information management, 55, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102186
  12. Carroll, N., Bjornson, F.O., Dingsoyr, T., Rolland, K., & Conboy, K. (2020). Operationalizing agile methods: examining coherence in large-scale agile transformations. In M. Paasivaara and P. Kruchten (Eds.), XP 2020 Workshops (pp. 75-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58858-8_8
  13. Carroll, N., Conboy, K., & Wang, X. (2023). From transformation to normalisation: An exploratory study of a large-scale agile transformation. Journal of Information Technology, 38(3), 267-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231164428
  14. Carroll, N., Mc Lafferty, B., Conboy, K., & Donnellan, B. (2021). Normalising a digital transformation. Internataional Conference on Information Systems, (pp. 1-9).
  15. Chalons, C., & Dufft, N. (2017). The role of IT as an enabler of digital transformation. In F. Abolhassan (Ed.), The Drivers of Digital Transformation (pp. 13-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31824-0_2
  16. Chukwunweike, J., & Aro, O. E. (2024). Implementing agile management practices in the era of digital transformation. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(1), 2223-2242. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.3253
  17. Cohn, M. (2024, July 15). How to overcome resistance to change, Mountain Goat Software.
  18. Congress Proceedings, (pp.1-11).
  19. Cruz, A., & Alves, A. C. (2020). Traditional, agile and lean project management-a systematic literature review. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 8(2), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02407
  20. Denning, S. (2025, January 17). How mapping the agile transformation journey points the way to continuous innovation, Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2019/03/17/how-mapping-the-agile-transformation-journey-points-the-way-to-continuous-innovation/
  21. Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013
  22. Dingsoyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033
  23. Eilers, K., Augner, T., Özkan, N., Peters, C., Bretschneider, U. (2025). Exploring the role of agile mindset in information systems: a systematic literature review. In: Peter, S., Kropp, M., Aguiar, A., Anslow, C., Lunesu, M.I., Pinna, A. (Eds.), Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming (pp.52-68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94544-1_4
  24. employee reward systems that keep on working, Ivey Business Journal. 70(4), 1-5.
  25. Fisher, D.M. (2004). The business process maturity model a practical approach for identifying opportunities for optimization. Business Process Trends. 9(4), 1-7.
  26. Fuchs, C., & Hess, T. (2018, December). Becoming agile in the digital transformation: the process of a large-scale agile transformation. International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-17). San Francisco, USA. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2018/innovation/Presentations/19
  27. Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  28. Henriksson, J. (2018). Building a strategy implementation framework for a consultancy company. [Master's Thesis, Metropolia University]. Finland.
  29. Hoda, R., Kruchten, P., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2010). Agility in context. In ACM International Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications (pp. 74-88) https://doi.org/10.1145/1869459.1869467
  30. https://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/blog/how-to-overcome-resistance-to-change
  31. Karadağ, E. (2009). Eğitim bilimleri alanında yapılmış doktora tezlerinin tematik açıdan incelemesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 75-87.
  32. Karvonen, T., Sharp, H., & Barroca, L. (2018, May). Enterprise agility: Why is transformation so hard? In J. Garbajosa et al. (Eds.), International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 131-145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91602-6_9
  33. Koutsikouri, D., Madsen, S., & Lindström, N. B. (2020, June 8-12). Agile transformation: How employees experience and cope with transformative change. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming Workshops (pp. 155-163). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58858-8_16
  34. Krancher, O. (2020, May). Agile software development practices and success in outsourced projects: The moderating role of requirements risk. In V. Stray et al. (Eds.), XP 2020 (pp. 56-72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49392-9_4
  35. Liljenberg, A. (2022). Contextual agility informing market shaping. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.013
  36. Lindvall, M., Basili, V., Boehm, B., Costa, P., Dangle, K., Shull, F., Tesoriero1, R., Williams, L. & Zelkowitz, M. (2002). Empirical findings in agile methods. In D. Wells & L. Williams (Eds.), XP/Agile Universe (pp. 197-207). Springer.
  37. Löffler, K. & Wedel, F.H. (2020). Literature review on operational vs. digital backbone: Successfully transforming IT infrastructure. IT Management at Digital Age Seminar, pp. (1-14).
  38. Mageed, I. A. (2025). Challenging the transformation of management practices through agility. Preprint, 10. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202505.2238.v1
  39. Manifesto Organization. https://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html
  40. May, C. R., Albers, B., Bracher, M., Finch, T. L., Gilbert, A., Girling, M., Greenwood, K., MacFarlane, A., Mair, F.S. ... & Rapley, T. (2022). Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development. Journal of Implementation Science, 17(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x
  41. May, C. R., Cummings, A., Girling, M., Bracher, M., Mair, F. S., May, C. M., ... & Finch, T. (2018). Using normalization process theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Journal of Implementation Science, 13(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1
  42. McKinsey & Company (2019). The journey to an agile organization, McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-journey-to-an-agile-organization
  43. McMackin, J., & Heffernan, M. (2021). Agile for HR: fine in practice, but will it work in theory? Human Resource Management Review, 31(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100791
  44. method-supported evaluation of agile principles in physical product development. CIRP Design Conference (pp. 600-614). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.218
  45. Miller, G. J. (2013). Agile problems, challenges, and failures, Project Management Institue Global
  46. Misra, S. C., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2009). Identifying some important success factors in adopting agile software development practices. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(11), 1869-1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.05.052
  47. Modransky, R., Jakabova, S., Hanak, M., & Olah, A. (2020). Lean and agile project management and the challenges for its implementation in SMEs in Czech republic. Technium Social Science Journal, 9, 413-440.
  48. Moe, N. B., Stray, V., & Hoda, R. (2019, May). Trends and updated research agenda for autonomous agile teams: a summary of the second international workshop. In R. Hoda (Ed.), International Conference on Agile Software Development, (pp. 13-19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30126-2_2
  49. Moh'd, S., Gregory, P., Barroca, L., & Sharp, H. (2024). Agile human resource management: A systematic mapping study. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 38(4), 345-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022231226316
  50. Naslund, D., & Kale, R. (2020). Is agile the latest management fad? A review of success factors of agile
  51. Normalization Process Theory (2025, January 10). Core propositions of NPT, Normalization Process
  52. Owusu, Y. A. (1999). Importance of employee involvement in world-class agile management systems. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(2), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/14654659910280938
  53. Paasivaara, M., Behm, B., Lassenius, C., & Hallikainen, M. (2018). Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: a case study. Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, 23(5), 2550-2596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9555-8
  54. Popoola, O. A., Adama, H. E., Okeke, C. D., & Akinoso, A. E. (2024). Conceptualizing agile development in digital transformations: Theoretical foundations and practical applications. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(4), 1524-1541.
  55. Ramesh, N., & Delen, D. (2021). Digital transformation: How to beat the 90% failure rate? IEEE engineering management review, 49(3), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2021.3070139
  56. Ramljak, I., Tajalic, M., & Brkljacic, M. (2024). Navigating digital transformation: A survey study on agile adoption impact. Enterprise Research Innovation, 10(1), 412-427.
  57. Ridoini, N., Benabdelhadi, A., Bıouaraine, H., & Belamrı, M. (2024). The role of human resources in digital transformation and organizational change management. International Journal of Economy Studies Management, 4(5). 1269-1293.
  58. Riehl, C., Koch, T., & Beckert, J. (2019). The importance of communicating change. Identifying predictors for support and resistance towards organizational change processes. Journal of Corporate Communications, 24(4), 670-685. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2019-0039
  59. Rothman, J. (2016). Agile and lean program management: Scaling collaboration across the organization.
  60. Schroeder, D., Luig, T., Finch, T.L. et al. (2022). Understanding implementation context and social processes through integrating normalization process theory (NPT) and the consolidated framework for ımplementation research (CFIR). Journal of Implement Science Communication 3(13), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00264-8
  61. Statista (2024). Spending on digital transformation technologies and services worldwide from 2017 to 2027, Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/870924/worldwide-digitaltransformation-market-size/
  62. Stettina, C. J., van Els, V., Croonenberg, J., & Visser, J. (2021, June). The impact of agile transformations on organizational performance: a survey of teams, programs and portfolios. In Gregory et al. (Eds.), International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 86-102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78098-2_6
  63. Szoke, A. (2011, May). A feature partitioning method for distributed agile release planning. In A. Sillitti et al. (Eds.), International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 27-42). Springer.
  64. the process of mechatronic system development: building a basic understanding for adaptive process design. NordDesign Conference (1-12).
  65. Theory. https://normalization-process-theory.northumbria.ac.uk/theory-behind-npt/core-propositions-of-npt/
  66. transformations. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. 12(4), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqss-12-2019-0142
  67. United States: Practical Ink.
  68. Varajao, J., Magalhaes, L., Freitas, L., Ribeiro, P., & Ramos, J. (2018). Implementing success management in an IT project. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 891-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.116
  69. Vilkki, K. (2010, October). When agile is not enough. In P. Abrahamsson and N. Oza (Eds.), Lean Enterprise Software and Systems (pp. 44-47). Springer.
  70. Villaumbrosia, C. G. (2025, August 23). What leaders need to know about agile transformation, Product School. https://productschool.com/blog/digital-transformation/agile-transformation
  71. Wang, X. (2011, August). The combination of agile and lean in software development: An experience report analysis, Agile Conference, (pp. 1-9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2011.36
  72. Worley, C.G. & Lawler, E. (2006). Winning support for organizational change: designing
  73. Yang, N., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., Siemon, D., & Hyrynsalmi, S. (2025, May). Core theories in agile software development. In S. Peter et al. (Eds.), International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 3-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94544-1_1
  74. Yin, Z., Caldas, C., Oliveira, D., Kermanshachi, S., & Pamidimukkala, A. (2023). Cross-functional collaboration in the early phases of capital projects: Barriers and contributing factors. Journal of Project Leadership and Society, 4, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100092
  75. Yüksel, Ö. (2007). İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi (6. Baskı). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  76. Zaoui, F., & Souissi, N. (2020). Roadmap for digital transformation: A literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 175 (2020), 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.090
  77. Zerezghi, Y. (2023). Challenges in adopting agile methodology in public organisations IT project management-A systematic literature review. [Master's Thesis, Stockholm University]. Sweden.
Sayı Kapağı
2025 Fall/Güz | Cilt 16, Sayı 4
Makale Bilgileri
Tür: Araştırma Makalesi
DOI: 10.5824/ajite.2025.04.007.x
Yıl: 2025
Cilt: 16
Sayı: 4
Sayfa: 450-497